...

Shannon: AI-Powered Application Security

SHANNON

Agentic static analysis combined with autonomous pentesting. Zero configuration. Real exploits, near-zero false positives.

Schedule a Demo

Scan your code. Exploit the findings.

Shannon operates as a two-stage pipeline: agentic static analysis of the codebase, followed by autonomous dynamic penetration testing against the running application. Findings from both stages are correlated to produce a unified, high-confidence result set with reproducible proof-of-concept exploits for every finding.

STAGE 1: AGENTIC STATIC ANALYSIS Git Clone / CI Hook repo ingestion + diff detection LLM Agent Reasoning multi-pass context analysis AST / IR Parsing multi-lang tree-sitter + CFG Taint Analysis source→sink Point Issues SQLi, XSS Business Logic authZ, IDOR SCA CVE + reach- ability Secrets keys, tokens creds Ranked Findings severity + exploitability + location Deduplicate + Prioritize + Enrich Enrichment priority + confidence + app context CWE → OWASP filter to OWASP categories STAGE 2: SHANNON PRO (13 AGENTS) 1. Pre-Recon static code analysis (no browser) code_analysis _deliverable.md 2. Recon attack surface mapping + browser recon _deliverable.md 3. Vuln Analysis 5 parallel OWASP agents injection | xss | auth | ssrf | authz → exploitation_queue.json if queue 4. Exploitation 5 parallel exploit agents Playwright + payload crafting → exploitation_evidence.md Core Principle: PoC or it didn't happen. Only proven exploits in report. 5. Report consolidate confirmed findings comprehensive_security_assessment_report.md Unified Report deduplicated, validated, with PoC for every finding

Stage 1: Agentic Static Analysis

Comprehensive code-level security assessment using LLM-powered agents across five core capabilities.

Data Flow Analysis

Your codebase is transformed into a Code Property Graph (CPG) — a unified representation of AST, control flow, and data flow — then analyzed in three phases. First, sources (user inputs, API parameters, file reads, environment variables) and sinks (SQL queries, shell commands, file writes, response outputs) are extracted using deterministic patterns plus AI-discovered custom input handlers unique to your framework. Then we trace backward from each sink toward potential sources, with an LLM evaluating at each node whether the specific sanitization actually addresses the specific risk — not just "is there a sanitizer," but "does this particular encoding prevent this particular injection in this context." Finally, an autonomous agent validates each candidate path for control flow correctness (can this branch actually execute?) and logic correctness (do the types and constraints line up?), producing confidence scores. Only validated, high-confidence paths make the final report, which means near-zero false positives on taint-style vulnerabilities like SQL injection, XSS, SSRF, path traversal, and command injection.

DATA FLOW ANALYSIS PIPELINE Codebase Build Code Property Graph AST + Control Flow + Data Flow 1. Extract Sources + Sinks Deterministic patterns + AI-discovered handlers SOURCES User inputs, API params File reads, env variables SINKS SQL queries, shell cmds File writes, HTTP responses 2. Trace Backward Sink to Source through CPG CODE PROPERTY GRAPH TRAVERSAL req.body source concat(id, input) operation htmlEscape() sanitizer? LLM evaluates: escape + risk? db.query() sink 3. Validate Autonomous agent confirms each path Control Flow: can this branch actually execute? Logic: do types and constraints line up? Validated Findings + Confidence Scores SQLi, XSS, SSRF, Path Traversal, Cmd Injection

Stage 2: Autonomous Dynamic Penetration Testing

Shannon implements this methodology with 13 specialized agents across 5 phases. Phases 1, 2, and 5 are sequential. Phases 3 and 4 run as pipelined parallel: each vuln/exploit pair is independent.

Phase 1: Pre-Reconnaissance

Static analysis maps the entire codebase, entry points, auth systems, database patterns, and security sinks, without ever touching a browser. This architectural blueprint tells downstream agents exactly where to focus and what to skip.

Phase 2: Reconnaissance

Browser automation validates code findings against the live application, confirming real endpoints, auth flows, and input vectors. Infrastructure discovery tools like Nmap and Subfinder extend coverage to the network perimeter.

Phase 3: Vulnerability Analysis

Five parallel agents (Injection, XSS, SSRF, Auth, and Authz) each combine code analysis with runtime probing to build structured exploitation queues. If an agent finds nothing in its domain, the corresponding exploit agent is skipped entirely, saving time and cost.

Phase 4: Exploitation

Exploit agents consume each queue and attempt real attacks via Playwright browser automation, classifying every finding as EXPLOITED, POTENTIAL, or FALSE POSITIVE.

Phase 5: Reporting

A reporting agent synthesizes confirmed evidence into a pentest-grade executive report with severity ratings, remediation guidance, and reproducible steps. Raw hypotheses and potential findings are programmatically stripped, only verified exploits reach the deliverable.

PHASE 1: PRE-RECONNAISSANCE pre-recon Pure code analysis, no browser code_analysis_deliverable.md PHASE 2: RECONNAISSANCE recon Attack surface mapping with browser recon_deliverable.md PHASE 3: VULN ANALYSIS 5 parallel agents, one per OWASP category injection-vuln injection_analysis _deliverable.md injection_exploitation _queue.json xss-vuln xss_analysis _deliverable.md xss_exploitation _queue.json auth-vuln auth_analysis _deliverable.md auth_exploitation _queue.json ssrf-vuln ssrf_analysis _deliverable.md ssrf_exploitation _queue.json authz-vuln authz_analysis _deliverable.md authz_exploitation _queue.json if queue has items PHASE 4: EXPLOITATION 5 parallel agents (only run if queue has items) injection-exploit injection_exploitation _evidence.md xss-exploit xss_exploitation _evidence.md auth-exploit auth_exploitation _evidence.md ssrf-exploit ssrf_exploitation _evidence.md authz-exploit authz_exploitation _evidence.md PHASE 5: REPORTING report Consolidate confirmed findings comprehensive_security_assessment_report.md Pipeline Complete
BLACK BOX MODE

True black box pentesting.
We never see your code.

Point Shannon at a URL and let it attack. Our agents autonomously navigate your application using a real browser and terminal, just like a human pentester would. Test as often as you like. No source code access, ever.

INPUT

Target URL + optional context

Provide a URL and optionally add credentials, focus areas, or an OpenAPI spec. Keep it pure black box or go gray box.

PROCESS

Autonomous agent exploitation

Agents navigate your app in a real browser, log in, use flows, and run terminal commands. Hypotheses are formed against OWASP 2025 (A01, A05, A07) and exploited.

OUTPUT

Pentest-grade report

Every validated exploit documented with a reproducible PoC, impact analysis, OWASP ID, and severity rating. Only confirmed vulnerabilities make the report.

Context configuration

All fields optional. Leave blank for pure black box, or fill in for gray box.

CREDENTIALS

Up to 4 login credentials. Supports Google OAuth, GitHub, and custom auth. Multiple credentials enable privilege escalation and IDOR testing across different roles and organizations.

FOCUS

Direct testing toward specific areas: your auth flow, a particular feature, a sub-service, or endpoints you're nervous about. "I built this quickly and I'm not sure how secure it is."

CONTEXT

For a gray box feel, describe business logic invariants, assumptions your app makes, legacy infrastructure details, or tech stack info to help target more accurate business logic testing.

AVOID

Exclude specific features, flows, or sub-services from testing. Useful for protecting production data, skipping known-good areas, or avoiding destructive operations.

OPENAPI SPEC

For the most thorough coverage, provide an OpenAPI specification. Gives the agent complete documentation of your endpoints for comprehensive analysis.

DEPLOYMENT TARGETS

Test against localhost dev setups via ngrok, or target staging and sandbox URLs after verifying domain ownership through DNS TXT record confirmation.

NEW

Get started with Shannon

FREE

Open Source

The autonomous AI pentest framework. Run it yourself, extend it however you want.

Autonomous pentest agents
Code review prompting
CLI deployment
Community support
View on GitHub
BLACK BOX

Shannon Pentest

Dynamic-only testing from an external attacker perspective. No source code required. Test as often as you like.

Unlimited runs
Autonomous pentesting (DAST)
Authenticated crawling
PoC exploit generation
Keygraph-hosted
Email support
Schedule a Demo
CLOUD
RECOMMENDED

Shannon Cloud

Full SAST + DAST platform hosted by Keygraph. Start scanning in minutes. Unlimited runs.

Unlimited runs
Full agentic SAST + SCA
Secrets + business logic analysis
Static→dynamic correlation
PoC exploit generation
CI/CD + PR scanning
Keygraph-hosted runner
Slack support channel
Schedule a Demo
ENTERPRISE

Shannon Enterprise

Self-hosted deployment. Your code never leaves your infrastructure. Unlimited runs.

Everything in Cloud
Unlimited runs
Self-hosted runner
Your own LLM API keys
Boundary analysis
Security evidence generation
Dedicated Slack channel
Custom integrations
Contact Sales

We don't report what might be vulnerable. We prove what is.

Schedule a Demo